vinkoCARDINAL VINKO PULJIC, ONE OF THE MEMBERS OF THE VATICAN MEDJUGORJE COMMISSION has told Croatian reporters the recent media rumors of the commission condemning the Medjugorje apparitions are ‘distorted’, ‘manipulated’, ‘unacceptable’ ‘wrong’ and ‘obviously having desire to undermine the good relations existing between the faithful who accept Medjugorje and go there for years on pilgrimage, and of the Holy Father’

This comes after Vatican Press office told the Catholic News Register on June 26 that “Vatican officials are privately irritated by the latest speculation, which they say is unfounded and needs to be swiftly quashed by the Holy See Press Office.”

Cardinal Puljic addressed the Holy Father’s comments saying: “The Pope, however, only wanted to say in some way to some visionaries who cannot live what they do and then make a media show of Our Lady saying she will appear at what time and when. He told them there is more need to turn around and listen to the Church, which is still studying the phenomenon of Medjugorje, and it shall make its own judgment.

“It is therefore unacceptable to interpret this as the final statement of the Pope, which some media have done very quickly.”

“I was on the committee that was examining the case of the apparitions and we have given our conclusions to the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith that should then be processed and presented to Pope Francis.”

“The Pope himself, I believe, will, about Medjugorje, make the good and fair decision. When people ask me what I think of all this, I tell them: To pray is not a sin, to go to confession is not a sin – and this is the most important thing.”

Cardinal Vinko Puljic was initially considered a skeptic of the Medjugorje apparitions, but since studying them on the committee has publicly spoken of the phenomena positively, calling it the largest confessional in Europe.

{ 1 comment }

Explanation by Dr. Mark Miravelle, professor of Theology and Mariology at Franciscan University, Steubenville, OH.

Obedience to the Church is the quintessential ingredient of authentic Catholic Marian devotion.

On October 21, 2013, Archbishop Carlo Viganò, Papal Nuncio to the United States, sent a letter to the Msgr. Ronny Jenkins, Secretary of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops regarding a Medjugorje visionary and his upcoming conferences in the United States. This letter was sent at the request of Archbishop Gerhard Müller, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith (the Vatican Congregation which oversees the evaluation of reports of Marian apparitions). The letter immediately addresses scheduled speaking engagements of Medjugorje visionary, Ivan Dragicevic, but then proceeds to enunciate the policy that “clerics and the faithful are not permitted to participate in meetings, conferences or public celebrations during which the credibility of such ‘apparitions’ would be taken for granted.”

In support of this restriction, the letter of the Nuncio quotes the major portion of a sentence from the Apri 10, 1991 statement of the Ex-Yugoslav (now Bosnian) Conference of Bishops at Zadar: “On the basis of the research that has been done, it is not possible to state that there were apparitions or supernatural revelations.” Although this restriction could potentially elicit elements of surprise and even confusion on the part of some, there is no true need for anxiety or loss of peace.

Let us examine this restriction in light of the Church’s own precedence in dealing with reported apparitions which are still undergoing investigation. Classically within the Church’s Tradition, there are three possible classifications concerning the ecclesiastical evaluation of an alleged Marian apparition: 1) constat de supernaturalitate, which indicates that the reported apparition “consists of a supernatural origin”; 2) non constat de supernaturalitate, which designates that the supernatural character of the reported apparition cannot be established at the time of examination, but leaves open the possibility for later ongoing evaluation (which could include later positive approval); and 3) constat de non supernaturalitate, which establishes that the alleged apparitions are not of a supernatural origin, and therefore devotees should in no way participate in or promulgate devotion to the alleged apparitions. While the letter of the Papal Nuncio does refer to the 1991 statement of the Bosnian bishops regarding Medjugorje, there are further elements contained in the 1991 declaration that are helpful for a more complete understanding of the official Bosnian Bishops declaration. In point of fact, the full sentence taken from the 1991 Bosnian Bishops statement reads: “On the basis of the investigations so far, it cannot be affirmed that one is dealing with supernatural apparitions and revelations.”

From the perspective of theology and Church precedence, the “so far” is critically important, as it clearly establishes the Bosnian Bishop statement regarding Medjugorje to fall within the second classification of “non constat de supernaturalitate” as opposed to “constat de non supernaturalitate.” In short, the Bosnian statement makes clear that Medjugorje is not a “prohibited” apparition, but a reported apparition which merits ongoing investigation.

Back to Church precedent. While a reported apparition is still under investigation, it is normally the case that personal devotion by the clergy or faithful, whether individually or in public gathering, is permitted by the Church, as long as there is not “official” parish or diocesan status given to the conference or pilgrimage, as such could lead to the erroneous conclusion that the reported apparition was already been officially approved by legitimate Church authority. Moreover, the clergy and faithful are free, on a personal basis, to accept a reported apparition as authentic, as long as there is the willingness to submit faithfully and obediently to the Church’s final and definitive judgment regarding the reported apparition’s authenticity. This, once again, typically includes permission to pilgrimage to the reported site, to gather privately or collectively to pray or to discuss the reported apparition, albeit without any official ecclesiastical endorsement implied.

Further, the 1991 Bosnian Bishops Statement goes on to state that even for pilgrims motivated by belief in the apparitions, pastoral care should be provided for these pilgrims, and hence the local bishop and other Bosnian bishops should in fact provide for such care: However, the numerous gatherings of the faithful from different parts of the world, who come to Medjugorje, prompted both by motives of belief and various other motives, require the attention and pastoral care in the first place of the diocesan bishop and with him of the other bishops also, so that in Medjugorje and in everything connected with it a healthy devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary may be promoted in accordance with the teaching of the Church.

Here we see the Bosnian statement seeks to provide pilgrims who are motivated to visit Medjugorje based on belief in the apparitions the appropriate pastoral care, without in any way discouraging, let alone prohibiting, private pilgrimages fostered by personal belief in the authenticity of the reported apparitions. Another Church directive which grants permission for “non official” pilgrimages to Medjugorje appears in the May 26, 1998 instruction from the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith itself. Archbishop Tarsisio Bertone, at that time Secretary to Cardinal Ratzinger in the CDF, states in a May 26, 1998 letter to French bishop, Most. Rev. Gilbert Aubry: As regards pilgrimages to Medjugorje, which are conducted privately, this Congregation points out that they are permitted on the condition that they are not regarded as an authentication of the events still taking place and which still call for an examination by the Church. Here again we see the approval of private pilgrimages, without any prohibition based on personal belief in the apparitions, but only with the qualification that the pilgrimage not be misconstrued as “authenticating” the apparitions while still under investigation. It is also important to note here that the recent letter of the U.S. Papal Nuncio does not prohibit the continuation of private pilgrimages to Medjugorje which were approved under the specified conditions both by the 1991 Bosnian declaration and in the 1998 CDF clarification.

Still, in this light, we can see why the new restrictions concerning conferences or public gatherings which presuppose Medjugorje’s credibility, as contained in the October 21 letter of the Papal Nuncio, could cause surprise and even confusion for those who have faithfully followed the Church’s disciplinary directives regarding Medjugorje up to this point. But surprise or confusion does not justify disobedience. To Medjugorje followers worldwide, I would say: obey and pray. As specified by the Nuncio at the directive of CDF, any Medjugorje “meetings, conferences or public celebrations during which the credibility of such ‘apparitions’ would be taken for granted” should be cancelled until further notice or change of policy by rightful Church authority. Medjugorje devotees must follow the stellar example of St. Pio during his some ten year prohibition by the Church from saying Mass publicly in light of the temporary Vatican and diocesan rejection of his reported mystical phenomena.

During his time of prohibition, Padre Pio never denied the authenticity of his stigmata, bilocation, or other authentically supernatural wonders (how could he?—they were true!). He simply obeyed. Recall as well the Church prohibition, both from the local diocese and from the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith, of the apparitions of Jesus to St. Faustina, which now constitutes the universally-approved and celebrated Divine Mercy devotion. Such is the sometimes imperfect process of the Church in the difficult task of evaluating what Blessed John XXIII called “those supernatural lights.” This prohibition was finally lifted in 1979 by the intercession of Bl. John Paul II, but only after many years during which Divine Mercy devotees had to obediently cease public celebration or distribution of the heavenly message of God’s infinite mercy. They too obeyed. This new restriction (which is nothing like a formal prohibition) can, in fact, become a providential opportunity to show the world that the great majority of Medjugorje followers live and breathe at the heart of the Church, in full obedience to the Church, and are not “fringe fanatics” whose faith hinges only on an alleged apparition, as some critics may at times assert. The proof is obedience. To the larger public, I would say: be clear and beware not to take the new restriction for what it is not: a definitive Church statement against Medjugorje’s authenticity. The CDF has a right, for whatever reason, to implement further restrictions while the ongoing Vatican Commission completes its study, which will ultimately go before Pope Francis for final judgment. But the fact remains, the Church process is not over. Medjugorje has not been declared “constat de non” by the U.S. Nuncio letter, and any conclusion or promulgation at this time that Medjugorje has been officially condemned would be its own form of disobedience to proper Church authority. To do so would be to usurp the role of the CDF and ultimately of Pope Francis himself to make the final discernment of the authenticity of Medjugorje—a critical and historic discernment which belongs to the Church’s Magisterium alone. Gamaliel had it right: “…If this plan or this undertaking is of men, it will fail; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them. You might even be opposing God” (Acts 5:38-39).

Dr. Mark Miravalle

Acts 5:38-39
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg Greek
38And now, therefore, I say to you, refrain from these men, and let them alone; for if this council or this work be of men, it will come to nought;
39But if it be of God, you cannot overthrow it, lest perhaps you be found even to fight against God. And they consented to him.


Statue Glowing in Medjugorje

September 25, 2013

I got a call last night, Sept. 23, 2013 from a good friend a little bit before midnight. He said that there are thousands of people at Vicka’s old house in Bijakovici, right at the foot of Apparition Hill. I immediately called my son Stephen and asked him if he was asleep or where he […]

Read the full article →

Syria: Pope calls for day of prayer and fasting.

September 2, 2013

 Today, dear brothers and sisters, I wish to add my voice to the cry which rises up with increasing anguish from every part of the world, from every people, from the heart of  each person, from the one great family which is humanity: it is the cry for peace! It is a cry which declares […]

Read the full article →

Ivan’s Apparition Tonight

August 23, 2013

Ivan’s apparition tonight: Today Our Lady came very happy and Joyful and she greeted us with her usual motherly greeting of Praised be Jesus my dear children. After this she extended her hands over all of us present here this evening and for a long time prayed over all of us in her Aramaic language. […]

Read the full article →

Ivan’s Apparition tonight August 23, 2013

August 23, 2013

Ivan’s apparition tonight Today Our Lady came very happy and Joyful and she greeted us with her usual motherly greeting of Praised be Jesus my dear children. After this she extended her hands over all of us present here this evening and for a long time prayed over all of us in her Aramaic language. […]

Read the full article →

Top Exorcist Laments Apathy to Medjugorje

November 2, 2011

Fr. Gabriele Amorth (born 1925) was ordained a priest in 1954 and became an official exorcist in 1986. For about 20 years he served as chief exorcist for the Diocese of Rome. In 1990 he founded the International Association of Exorcists whose president he was until his retirement in 2000, now being honorary president for […]

Read the full article →


April 15, 2010

Rome (IKA) – The Holy See Press Office published on April 13, 2010 report from the first session of International Investigative Commission on Medjugorje, held on March 26th,2010. International Investigative Commission on Medjugorje is being presided over by Cardinal Camillo Ruini, who used to be Vicar of Rome Diocese and includes several cardinals and archbishops, […]

Read the full article →

Possibility of New Diocese for Medjugorje Floated

April 10, 2010

Rome, Italy, March 22 (CNA) .- Following last week’s announcement that a commission is being formed to investigate possible Marian apparitions at Medjugorje, a typically well-informed Vatican journalist has reported that a new diocese could be formed in the area to include the Bosnian city. Taking territory currently under the jurisdiction of three other dioceses, […]

Read the full article →

Caviezel credits ‘Passion’ role to Medjugorje

April 5, 2010

Sunday, April 04, 2010 • In February Jim Caviezel made his sixth pilgrimage to Medjugorje and afterwards travelled to Vienna where he gave an interview to Christian Stelzer for the magazine Oase des Friedens. The Croatian translation is published in the latest edition of the Medjugorje parish magazine Glasnik mira. • Jim, can you tell […]

Read the full article →